do you like music theory and history?

 Pearl Jam - Yellow Ledbetter (Official Audio) - YouTube

man, woman, tv

who can solve this cipher?

I think "person" and "camera" are duds - perhaps idiosyncrasies of set patterns of speech denoting patterns of pauses in this case. DJT is programmed to hire conspiracy theoretic tv personalities, and is deliberately designed to favour his own self-image in his ship of fools.

real or drawn?

 

Borat

Giuliani did not recognize SBC and was none the wiser when he wandered so easily into one of Sacha Baron Cohen pranks by luring him into a compromising position. I'd say that that speaks volumes of how stupid, intellectually lazy, uninformed - uninterested in the real world -, and predictable the MAGA people really are.

Trump is like that. And he got voted in by a cultivated, culpable zealots of MAGA with a mere slim margin of American voters (historical, indeed!). Cult members of any stripe, ilk, and inclination will always march mindlessly into the maw of the likes of the Jonestown mass suicide. But, then again, this is The Sum of All Fears, for real. Or, what Putin is threaten to inflict upon our world.

for those grieving the "win" by Trump

PBS, from America

Reuters, to the world

I once read a piece, written by whom I do not remember, that 'dictatorships' rarely survive the dictator's demise.

A study into the nature of Inuktitut - the framework

When one looks closely into Inuktut pragmatics, one finds this:

Taamasi Qumaq:

uqaqtuq – inuk suliniraqsuni isumaminik uqatuarami taga uqaqtuq piujumik piunngitumigluuniit

            person/ truth+claims+he+when/ (about)+his+mind/, talks+immediately+when/, thus/,                    speak+he/ good/ good+not+it+a+or/ 

or,

speaks - when a person claims to tell the truth as far as he/she is aware of and faithful to that gotten knowledge, thus, says something - good or bad - about that given subject (vouchsafed)

-----

In Inuktut, the semantic and connotational features are "invisible" (ie, "implied") in formalized/ritualized speech, like any and all human languages. But it is systematic and systemic in that it is called an "3rd person, singular, indicative mood" in linguistics. This verbal inflection is then compared to other forms: "let me..."; "am I..?" (I'll explain these verbal modality in later posts)

This is Aimo Paniloo

this is Aimo Paniloo:

Twist Of Words - Kangiqtugaapik

He can conceive of and orchestrate stuff like this and best me in this rendition of a song I wrote (sans words):

ᐊᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦ (Cover)

A study into the nature of Inuktitut - an introduction

The morpho-syntactic rules of the Inuit-Yupik language, unified across the board in this respect, are different from SVO or OSV languages, say, English or French. Inuktut (the Inuit language) has this syntax for the intransitive predicate:

pisuk                   +       tunga                              pisuktunga

to walk                        (or verb-ing)+I               to walk I am                   I am walking/I walk

The pattern looks like this: infinitive verb + default (progressive) present tense/aspect + subject of the predicate in the indicative mood.

To this, one may insert non-present adverbial tenses (more on proximity of temporality later).

pisuk                   +        lauq+tunga                        pisulauqtunga

to walk                         past I                                  to walk I did                I was walking/I walked

or,

pisuk                   +          niaq+tunga                        pisungniaqtunga

to walk                           future I                              to walk I will              I will be walking/ I will                                                                                                                         walk

-------------

In my next installment, I will explain the use of other subject pronominal endings (person and number) that go with the intransitive, indicative mood using different adverbial morphemes (such as manner, frequency, degree, movement and direction, etc.).

Mindful standing and walking(?)

I don't know if what I think I've found would be called, "mindful posture/posturing"; I think that that has to do with Buddhists' notions of meditation.

The thing I found is mindfully seeking the proper alignment of my upper torso, legs, and soles of my feet in the most balanced and relaxed form as I stand still. I also seek the most relaxed, balanced gait as I walk.

This has been kind of a switch for me because I've always slouched sitting and standing, and, now, I've developed an arthritic right hip and a sometimes audible, clicking pop of my right knee cap if I have sat for too long and then I move to stand up.

I think this intention of mind and body in the way I stand and walk not only helps with the way I sit, but also that it helps me with my overall sense of well-being. I seem to be more awake and engaged.

when was I at my most happy last?

I'm not very personable at the best of times (to people who don't (and do) know me I may seem rude and impatient most times).

One of my saddest regrets is to have lost my greatest love simply because I didn't know (don't know) how to express the depths of my affection and joy when it comes to my home, my safe place (her).

here is a picture when I was at my happiest, when I felt the most safe.

                                             [probably playing along to a Pink Floyd song, wanting to be David Gilmour]

diddy assault video

 this is "normal" in many aboriginal women's lives. WHY!!! It makes no sense no matter how one explains it!!!

Video appears to show Sean 'Diddy' Combs assaulting former girlfriend Cassie Ventura (youtube.com) 

I think we need to listen to this

 Home and done it's just begun

His heart weighs more
More than it ever did before
What has he done?
God help my son
Hey, stay a while, I'll stay up
No sugar is enough to bring sweetness to his cup
I know sorrow tastes the same on any tongue

How was I to feel it
When a gun was in my hands
And I'd waited for so long
How was I to see straight
In the dust and blinding sun
Just a pair of boots on the ground

On the screen the young men die
The children cry
In the rubble of their lives
What has he done?
God help my son
Hey, stay a while, I'll stay up
The volume pumped right up
But not enough to drown it out
I hear "Mama" sounds the same in any tongue

How am I to see you
When my faith stands in the way
And the wailing is long done
How am I to know you
With a joystick in my hand
When the call to arms has come

Source: Musixmatch

Songwriters: David Jon Gilmour / Polly Anne Samson

and here is the video: ReWave CA V12 16x9 VO1 (youtube.com)

Gestalt Linguistics vs Structuralist Linguistics

I've always been interested in the umwelt concept ever since I came across it in my readings on semiotics and linguistics. "Umwelt" was first mentioned and defined in the works of Jakob von Uexküll and Thomas Sebeok. It may be summarized in this statement:

[The notions of umwelt are based on the] "biological [and psychological - mine] foundations that lie at the very center of the study of both communication and signification in the human [and non-human] animal" (Sebeok, Thomas A. (1976). "Foreword". Contributions to the Doctrine of Signs. Lisse, Netherlands: Peter de Ridder Press. p. x. ISBN 0-87750-194-7)

Gestalt psychology, itself, was a counter to the, at the times, prevalent British empiricism, which gave birth, ultimately, to structuralism that believed in these three fundamental philosophical pillars:

1. "atomism," also known as "elementalism," the view that all knowledge, even complex abstract ideas, is built from simple, elementary constituents
2. "sensationalism," the view that the simplest constituents—the atoms of thought—are elementary sense impressions
3. "associationism," the view that more complex ideas arise from the association of simpler ideas. (Gestalt psychology - Wikipedia)

Unwittingly or not, these three axioms of the structuralist program have had (in my view) a huge negative, impact on the teaching of Inuit language in Nunavut (and, perhaps on all aboriginal communities of Canada and beyond) - at least in a flawed and indiscriminate application of analytical version of de Saussure's structuralism.

I've had a long career as a commentator on Inuit language and education and as an on-and-off Inuit language instructor. I've tried to remain as faithful as I can to the Nunavut Arctic College Inuit Language Programs and yet be able to express my views on (an alternative) predicate plus obligatory arguments grammar as quietly and non-disruptively as I could manage.

The current Inuit language instruction for college students in Nunavut, unfortunately, does not make any distinction between predicate verb phrases, subordinate, relative, and complement clauses, and subject and object noun phrases. A theory-free morphological treatment of verb phrases (VP) and noun phrases (NP) that are possible in the Inuit language rules the day rather than being regarded as a major pitfall to understanding and linguistic competence that it really is. 

Person, number and verbal moods that are built into the subject and object pronominal NPs are coached in terms of "1st person singular"; 2nd person dual"; and "3rd person plural" naive patterning principles (ie, not as "I am..."; "you are..."; and "she/he/it is...") and this really screws up and confuses the discernment and understanding of grammatical and ungrammatical constructs that the student has naturally acquired at home and community. Most students pass the current  "linguistics" courses offered in Nunavut simply because they are severely watered down and do not require any deep thinking and understanding (ie, the terminology can be rote memorized even if they do not make sense to the students and the exam tasks are always closed questions).

In my current position, I am involved in curriculum and educational resources development projects. This has provided me the opportunities to participate in intellectually satisfying discussions amongst knowledgeable education experts, and this allows me to pursue further research and advocate for alternative approaches to Inuit language pedagogy.

I've decided to call these alternative approaches to language instruction "gestalt linguistics" with a view of using minimal university-level linguistics terminology and a heavier emphasis on text-based language arts approach where analysis forms only a half of a re-synthesis programming based on well-formedness of Inuktitut grammar. My philosophy of language is based on the gestalt insights founded on the subsequent axioms of the premise: "the whole is more than the sum of its parts".

Gestalt linguistics tries to incorporate the best of both gestalt and structuralist psychologies and insights rather than coaching them in terms of warring factions or worldviews.

I will sign off with this quote from van Gogh in order to leave no nagging doubt of the Gestalt approach:

There are laws of proportion, of light and shadow, of perspective, which one must know in order to be able to draw well; without that knowledge it remains a fruitless struggle, and one never creates anything.

(van Gogh's personal correspondence to his brother, Theo)