PBS, from America
Reuters, to the world
I once read a piece, written by whom I do not remember, that 'dictatorships' rarely survive the dictator's demise.
PBS, from America
Reuters, to the world
I once read a piece, written by whom I do not remember, that 'dictatorships' rarely survive the dictator's demise.
When one looks closely into Inuktut pragmatics, one finds this:
Taamasi Qumaq:
uqaqtuq – inuk suliniraqsuni isumaminik uqatuarami taga uqaqtuq piujumik piunngitumigluuniit
person/ truth+claims+he+when/ (about)+his+mind/, talks+immediately+when/, thus/, speak+he/ good/ good+not+it+a+or/
or,
speaks - when a person claims to tell the truth as far as he/she is aware of and faithful to that gotten knowledge, thus, says something - good or bad - about that given subject (vouchsafed)
-----
In Inuktut, the semantic and connotational features are "invisible" (ie, "implied") in formalized/ritualized speech, like any and all human languages. But it is systematic and systemic in that it is called an "3rd person, singular, indicative mood" in linguistics. This verbal inflection is then compared to other forms: "let me..."; "am I..?" (I'll explain these verbal modality in later posts)
The morpho-syntactic rules of the Inuit-Yupik language, unified across the board in this respect, are different from SVO or OSV languages, say, English or French. Inuktut (the Inuit language) has this syntax for the intransitive predicate:
pisuk + tunga pisuktunga
to walk (or verb-ing)+I to walk I am I am walking/I walk
The pattern looks like this: infinitive verb + default (progressive) present tense/aspect + subject of the predicate in the indicative mood.
To this, one may insert non-present adverbial tenses (more on proximity of temporality later).
pisuk + lauq+tunga pisulauqtunga
to walk past I to walk I did I was walking/I walked
or,
pisuk + niaq+tunga pisungniaqtunga
to walk future I to walk I will I will be walking/ I will walk
-------------
In my next installment, I will explain the use of other subject pronominal endings (person and number) that go with the intransitive, indicative mood using different adverbial morphemes (such as manner, frequency, degree, movement and direction, etc.).
I don't know if what I think I've found would be called, "mindful posture/posturing"; I think that that has to do with Buddhists' notions of meditation.
The thing I found is mindfully seeking the proper alignment of my upper torso, legs, and soles of my feet in the most balanced and relaxed form as I stand still. I also seek the most relaxed, balanced gait as I walk.
This has been kind of a switch for me because I've always slouched sitting and standing, and, now, I've developed an arthritic right hip and a sometimes audible, clicking pop of my right knee cap if I have sat for too long and then I move to stand up.
I think this intention of mind and body in the way I stand and walk not only helps with the way I sit, but also that it helps me with my overall sense of well-being. I seem to be more awake and engaged.
I'm not very personable at the best of times (to people who don't (and do) know me I may seem rude and impatient most times).
One of my saddest regrets is to have lost my greatest love simply because I didn't know (don't know) how to express the depths of my affection and joy when it comes to my home, my safe place (her).
here is a picture when I was at my happiest, when I felt the most safe.
[probably playing along to a Pink Floyd song, wanting to be David Gilmour]this is "normal" in many aboriginal women's lives. WHY!!! It makes no sense no matter how one explains it!!!
Video appears to show Sean 'Diddy' Combs assaulting former girlfriend Cassie Ventura (youtube.com)
Home and done it's just begun
I've always been interested in the umwelt concept ever since I came across it in my readings on semiotics and linguistics. "Umwelt" was first mentioned and defined in the works of Jakob von Uexküll and Thomas Sebeok. It may be summarized in this statement:
[The notions of umwelt are based on the] "biological [and psychological - mine] foundations that lie at the very center of the study of both communication and signification in the human [and non-human] animal" (Sebeok, Thomas A. (1976). "Foreword". Contributions to the Doctrine of Signs. Lisse, Netherlands: Peter de Ridder Press. p. x. ISBN 0-87750-194-7)
Gestalt psychology, itself, was a counter to the, at the times, prevalent British empiricism, which gave birth, ultimately, to structuralism that believed in these three fundamental philosophical pillars:
Unfortunately, I'm one of those.
When I've been fortunate enough to be in serious relationships, I've been able to stop drinking (with a couple of relapses here and there, mind) sometimes for years on end. But when I moved to Rankin Inlet I became a binge drinker, downing 40 oz. bottles in one sitting over a couple of days. I'd pass out and immediately resume my drinking when I woke up.
Bootleg alcohol is so readily available in that small Nunavut's second city and I became physically and psychologically reliant on that. I made life-long friends and loved my co-workers and students there but I was suffering existentially: even in purgatory, caring for others holds profound currency. That was my saving grace.
In my first year and few months living there, I was abstaining completely from alcohol and weed. I'd go to work in the morning, go to the store to get my daily meals after work, and then go home. That was to extent of my life. It was very lonely. For someone like me who is incapable of spontaneously seeking out company, the loneliness became a real killer of my sobriety.
I had to run away after a few years. I couldn't afford to go on holidays outside of the community and really was there the whole time. I didn't complete my contract so I had to leave everything behind. My books, my research, my prized possessions, everything, including my daughter's water colour she called "butterflies and flower garden" which she gave to me and I valued and kept. I think my stuff might still there, if it hasn't been raided over the years already and is now long gone.
When I got back to Iqaluit I was fortunate enough to be allowed to continue teaching. People at the Arctic College still believed in me. I taught the winter semester and the final stretch of the school year. I love teaching and am good at it.
After that, I was hired as an Inuit language specialist by my current employer and I moved to Toronto and placed here strategically to do the work I was hired to do. I love my job and am allowed freedom to try my hand at things that I might find interesting and might be good at. I'm involved in team projects as diverse as developing Inuit language teaching resources, writing children's books, in production of children's television shows, doing research and writing commentary on IQ (Inuit knowledge), and I have continued teaching, but now, I'm also developing the Inuit language courses I teach.
After moving to my current position I still drank heavily, especially during the pandemic. Hey, I've had and continue to deal with my shit as best I'm able to and can do. But I've slowly come to realize that I need to do my "moral inventory" truthfully almost on a daily basis if I'm to transcend that horrible shit (some of my own making and some from my childhood). I know that my only path is to try and forgive the unforgivable (ie, myself and others).
I've vacillated wildly between two extremes: drinking to the point of oversaturation and abstaining completely - at least for a couple of months. But during what I put myself through I've had a profound epiphany of sorts: I realized that I'm a perfect example of the warnings and admonitions of IQ and ancient Greek philosophy regarding living a loose, mindlessly-lived life.
I've always been interested in the ethics of the ancient Greeks and enlightenment philosophies and, in my work on IQ research, I've met and worked with people who actually walk the talk, I mean, besides my parents and grandparents (well, I have my mom's temper). I was surrounded by love before I had to go to school. But the consonant theme has always been the principles of moderation and seeking balance. -Inuit philosophy is very much akin to Daoist philosophy in that respect.
I decided that I want to try something else regarding my struggles with alcohol and mindlessly allowing people of questionable character (including myself) to live rent-free in my almost constant monkey mind.
I've sworn off my beloved Irish and Canadian whiskeys and my as hitherto unchallenged, very strong desire to achieve oblivion at any cost. Believe me, my unexamined life style has costed me a lot. I'm now starting to set limits, boundaries, and making deliberate plans to living my days reasonably: no more resumption of drinking even when I wake up from a fitful sleep; drinking only beer but only after putting in a good day's work and honouring my commitments.
Over the last three weeks or so, I've not gotten drunk at all (and most times, I've been able to stop drinking even without getting a beer buzz) because I'm now mindfully pacing my consumption. A tallboy can of beer (a pint) now normally lasts me a couple of hours to drink. The whole point is not to get drunk but rather try and keep my physical cravings for alcohol at bay.
I feel empowered for the first time because I'm not being forced by circumstance and/or people to control my drinking. We all have an inborn need for self -actualization and -determination. Even despite myself, I've always been able to cultivate and celebrate my talents largely without the need to boast about them (always been interested to see how far I can take them), but the notions, and realization, of self determination is something almost completely a novel thing for me.
I may stumble and fall sometimes (and I've had a couple of episodes of trying days and mood swings already since making my decision), but that doesn't mean I ought to viscerally and immediately react to them and destroy my resolve to stick to my program in the process.
I feel hopeful.
I'm a believer in the Gematria of the Hebrew script and equi-distancing it into rows and columns of matrices that are allowed to commute and rearrange until something sensible comes along. -spoiler alert: Hitler is in there. so, is Wilbert.
...Waldo
...by Siegfried Sassoon. -From whom I still care deeply about, thusly:
What share we most—we two together?
Smells, and awareness of the weather.
What is it that makes us more than dust?
My trust in h[er]; in me, h[er] trust. [-sorry Sassoon. Jpt]
I'm pretty sure I have the Asperger's Syndrome. I seem to be able to follow instructions well enough to perform the required tasks at a high degree of performance. Mathematics, linguistics, art, I can do as demanded.
But I seem to have a hard time engaging with people at the personal level. People, to me, are avatars (fictional characters) that I cannot take seriously unless I know them personally.